In this news:
Washington DC: An appeals court on Friday lifted a block on executive orders seeking to end government support for diversity, equity and inclusion programmes, handing the Trump administration a win after a string of setbacks defending President Donald Trump's agenda from dozens of decision from a three-judge panel allows the orders to be enforced as a lawsuit challenging them plays out. The appeals court judges halted a nationwide injunction from US District Judge Adam Abelson in of the judges on the 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals wrote that Trump's anti-DEI push could eventually raise concerns about First Amendment rights but said the judge's sweeping block went too read | Trump Announces First Arrest Under Executive Order Targeting ‘Anti-American’ Students"My vote should not be understood as agreement with the orders' attack on efforts to promote diversity, equity and inclusion," Judge Pamela Harris wrote. Two of the panel's members were appointed by President Barack Obama, while the third was appointed by had found the orders likely violated free-speech rights and are unconstitutionally vague since they do not have a specific definition of signed an order his first day in office directing federal agencies to terminate all "equity-related" grants or contracts. He signed a follow-up order requiring federal contractors to certify that they do not promote city of Baltimore and other groups sued the Trump administration, arguing the executive orders are an unconstitutional overreach of presidential Justice Department has argued that the president was targeting only DEI programmes that violate federal civil rights laws. Government attorneys said the administration should be able to align federal spending with the president's , who was nominated by Democratic President Joe Biden, agreed with the plaintiffs that the executive orders discourage businesses, organisations and public entities from openly supporting diversity, equity and inclusion.
.png)
